Tag: illusion

Are you sick of hearing from Lodsys? We know devs are, but the rather outspoken patent troll is at it again, hitting the blog to defend its good name. Hidden among today’s posts is an announcement that the firm is taking the next steps with its accusations, filing a lawsuit against some of the developers it previously targeted and, get this, blaming Apple. It explains: “Lodsys chose to move its litigation timing to an earlier date than originally planned, in response to Apple’s threat, in order to preserve its legal options.” We’re not sure which developers are targeted by this suit, specifically, but the firm has promised a $1,000 payment to each dev, “if it turns out that the scope of Apple’s existing license rights apply to fully license you with respect to our claim relating to your App on Apple iOS.” Devs may be tempted to spend that promised gift on a well-deserved vacation (or a WWDC conference pass), but with layers of LLCs protecting the man behind the curtain at Lodsys, we wouldn’t be surprised it the firm disappeared before anyone sees a cent (or 99) of payment. Unfortunately, it appears that the saga continues, so if you’ve had enough of the patent troll, feel free to enjoy the rest of our content, Lodsys free.

[Thanks, Andrew]

Update: We’ve been told that the list of devs named in the lawsuit include: Combay, Iconfactory, Illusion Labs, Shovelmate, Quickoffice, Richard Shinderman, and Wulven Game Studios.

Lodsys hits devs with lawsuit, $1,000 offer, and 1,000 words of eloquent prose originally appeared on Engadget on Tue, 31 May 2011 18:34:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

You’ve got to hand it to Tokyo’s University of Electro-Communications, the school’s researchers have presented some truly unique methods for interfacing with our electronics — fake finger sliding, a head-mounted video display, a thing that makes it feel like you’ve got insects on your palm, and, of course, the old kissing machine. A few recent inventions have expanded the latter trend, giving us creative new ways of getting intimate with our machines. There’s the tickle interface, for one, which beams images from a connected smartphone creating the illusion that the person on the other end is tickling your palm — made all the more real by tactile vibration hooked up to the rear of the device. And then there’s the older, oddly-named Sense-Roid, sort of a clunkier version of the Hug Shirt, which, among other things, lets you “hug yourself.” Both are demonstrated in a pair of videos after the break. Whatever you do, don’t miss the second one.

Continue reading Tokyo school takes Facebook Poking to a creepy new level (video)

Tokyo school takes Facebook Poking to a creepy new level (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Thu, 12 May 2011 16:31:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

This comes from the same touchy-feely Kajimoto lab in Japan that brought us the tactile kiss transmission device and we totally see where they’re going with it: maximum sensation, minimum effort. You only have to exert the gentlest of pressures on this prototype touch pad and it zaps your fingertip with little electrical signals, mimicking the feeling of sliding your finger over a surface. We imagine it’s a bit like the little red pointing stick in the middle of a Lenovo ThinkPad keyboard, for example, but with the addition of “position-dependent data input” to create the illusion that your finger is actually touching different areas of the screen. For now though, if you don’t mind stretching a finger to your old-stylee mouse or trackpad, then check out the video after the break.

Continue reading Touch pad prototype works without movement, makes fingertips feel like they’re sliding (video)

Touch pad prototype works without movement, makes fingertips feel like they’re sliding (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 11 May 2011 09:44:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , ,


We’ve already seen plenty of glasses-free 3D HDTVs and portable devices, but a promising new technology called HR3D (High-Rank 3D) has hit the prototype phase. Engineers from MIT’s Media Lab, who developed the new solution, say that it avoids compromising on screen brightness, resolution, viewing angle, and battery life, and doesn’t require those pesky (and pricey) 3D glasses. HR3D uses a pair of layered LCDs to give the illusion of depth, with the top layer (or mask) displaying a variable pattern based on the image below it, so each eye sees a slightly different picture. Nintendo’s 3DS uses a similar technique, but with a parallax barrier instead of a second display. The designers constructed the prototype from two Viewsonic VX2265wm displays, removing the LCDs from their housings and pulling off polarizing filters and films. We’ve yet to go eyes-on with HR3D, so we’re a mite skeptical, but tech this promising is worth watching closely, and from every angle.

Continue reading MIT Media Lab develops glasses-free HR3D, supports broad viewing angles (video)

MIT Media Lab develops glasses-free HR3D, supports broad viewing angles (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 04 May 2011 21:21:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Kodak PYNK Smart Print System (Image property OhGizmo!)
By Andrew Liszewski

Getting one of those multi-image matte board photo frames to look as good as the photos of the included sample family do can be difficult if your craft-fu is lacking. So Kodak has introduced their PYNK Smart Print System which takes the cutting, resizing and pasting photos steps out of the equation. You have your choice of one of eight different frames that include a pre-cut matte board, and a unique identifying barcode on the back.

Once you scan the barcode at a PYNK-compatible Kodak printing station you then upload and specify which of your photos will appear in each of the holes. Obviously the number of photos needed, and their size and layout, depends on the frame you selected. But everything can be easily tweaked and adjusted at the kiosk. When you’re happy with the results a single photo of your collage will be printed out which can then be inserted into the frame, creating the illusion you’ve got some excellent crating skills.

Kodak PYNK Smart Print System

Online Business Consulting Internet Business Consulting

See the original post:
CES 2011 Kodak’s PYNK Smart Print System Makes Creating Photo Collages A Breeze For The Craftily Challenged

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

NSFW: Another Junk Peripheral Not “junk” as in “trash”, but “junk” as in “tickle pickles”, “flesh bananas” or “knobgoblins”. You know, dicks!

To date, Japan produced at least two big ding dong peripherals: SOM was released in late 2008. It connects to player’s computers via USB and even syncs to “climax scenes” in erotic games. A “piston machine” was also released for ladies. NSFW: Another Junk Peripheral

Then there’s this “tech demo” from Japanese erotic game maker Illusion Soft. The contraption has a vibration function, and it’s possible to select things like size. Whether or not this contraption comes to retail is still to be decided.

Tech Arts 3D, makers of ero title 3D Custom Girl, are hard at work on this. It’s, well, it’s pretty obvious what it is! It is USB powered and runs on open source software for eroge.

Tech Arts is working on all sorts of sexy R&D from a mixed reality headset to implementing SOM’s whack-off machine with its games. Last year, the company focused its attention on face-tracking tech. (Read: looking up skirts.)

NSFW: Another Junk Peripheral Some people cure diseases, others solve crime. The folks at Tech Arts think about computer games and masturbation. Not necessarily in that order.

Tech Arts 3D Official Site NSFW

Send an email to the author of this post at bashcraft@kotaku.com.



Best Membership Site Software

See the original post:
NSFW: Another Junk Peripheral Culture Smash

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

i3DG Palm Top Theater (Image courtesy UEDA.nl)
By Andrew Liszewski

Using an old theatrical stage magic technique invented in the 1860’s by magician John Henry Pepper (Pepper’s Ghost) this Palm Top Theater accessory for your iPhone or iPod Touch lets you enjoy 3D content without the need for any kind of glasses. Well, kind of. You see it’s kind of a pseudo-3D effect that involves layering 3 different layers of video or animations using half-silvered mirrors at 45 degree angles. Without the accessory on your idevice the video being played back just looks like 3 separate animations stacked on top of each other. But when viewing it from the proper angle through the i3DG, the videos end up overlaid on each other, giving the illusion of depth.

The i3DG was invented by a media artist named Jitsuro Mase, and while you can’t actually buy one, if you happen to be in town for the Rotterdam Film Festival early next year you will have the chance to check it out in person.

i3DG Palm Top Theater VIA CreativeApplications.Net

See the original post:
i3DG Palm Top Theater ‘Finally’ Brings 3D To Your iPhone Or iPod

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brainThe human brain is one of the most remarkable things on this planet…but that doesn’t mean it can’t make mistakes, particularly when it comes to how we see the world. Here are five mind-blowing optical illusions and how they work.

Before we get started, I just want to assure everyone – these videos are all real optical illusions, not just stupid scare videos. And I’ve left out some of the more visually disturbing illusions like the Thatcher effect, because quite honestly it freaks me out a bit too much to sensibly discuss. So now here are five optical illusions that will make you think the entire world has gone crazy around you…

The Checkerboard Illusion

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

This checkerboard is the creation of Edward H. Adelson, Professor of Vision Science at MIT. First published in 1995, it presents two squares on a checkerboard and claims that they’re the same color. This seems impossible to believe – I know I busted out the MS Paint and put the two squares next to each other just to make sure I hadn’t been hoodwinked. But they really are the exact same shade of gray, despite the fact that our brains seemingly refuse to believe it.

So how does it work? A lot of it has to do with the shadows cast by the big green cylinder. As Adelson explains, the brain has to assess how much light is coming off the surface of each square on the board. This is known as the luminance of each square, and the brain also has to figure out how much of the luminance (or lack thereof) is caused by the color of the square and how much is created by the shadows. So the brain has to figure out where the shadows are and then compensate for them, and that’s where we start running into trouble.

Adelson explains some of these processes:

The first trick is based on local contrast. In shadow or not, a check that is lighter than its neighboring checks is probably lighter than average, and vice versa. In the figure, the light check in shadow is surrounded by darker checks. Thus, even though the check is physically dark, it is light when compared to its neighbors. The dark checks outside the shadow, conversely, are surrounded by lighter checks, so they look dark by comparison.

A second trick is based on the fact that shadows often have soft edges, while paint boundaries (like the checks) often have sharp edges. The visual system tends to ignore gradual changes in light level, so that it can determine the color of the surfaces without being misled by shadows. In this figure, the shadow looks like a shadow, both because it is fuzzy and because the shadow casting object is visible.

Part of the problem is where the squares are located. Most people know enough about checker or chessboards to know that a square will be the opposite color of all the adjacent squares. That means two squares that are next to each other, or separated by an even number of squares, should be different colors. Since squares A and B are two squares away, they logically should be different colors, and our brains really seem to want to think that as well.

But don’t worry, says Professor Adelson. All this really means is that your brain is functioning the way it’s supposed to:

As with many so-called illusions, this effect really demonstrates the success rather than the failure of the visual system. The visual system is not very good at being a physical light meter, but that is not its purpose. The important task is to break the image information down into meaningful components, and thereby perceive the nature of the objects in view.

The Dragon Illusion

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

This one seems utterly impossible until you know the secret. I mean, it seems even more impossible than your average illusion. After all, what kind of optical illusion makes a dragon’s head move around like that? Surely this must be some unholy demonry…or, at the very least, cheap camera trickery. But no, your brain really is doing all the heavy lifting on this illusion.

The secret is that we assume the dragon’s head is convex – in other words, its features are pushed out to form a 3D head. This is because our own heads are convex, as is just about everything else we see. Because the world is overwhelmingly convex, our brains work overtime to make the dragon’s head convex as well, even though it requires glossing over lots of little clues to the contrary, including depth cues, shadows, and the fact that the impossible dragon is following you everywhere you go.

In reality, the dragon’s head is concave, meaning all its features are pushed in. It’s like looking at the inside of a mask, and it means the head will appear to move around in sync with wherever our eyes go. Actually, the dragon’s head moves twice as fast as our eyes do, but this can be difficult to pick up on. This is known as the Hollow-Face illusion.

But definitely don’t feel bad that your mind keeps seeing that damn dragon’s head as convex, even once you know the truth. Again, it’s a good sign that your brain is misidentifying the right visual cues. In fact, one study revealed that the hollow-face illusion is one of the most powerful examples of how schizophrenic patients see the world differently than others. In a test of 16 control patients and 13 schizophrenia suffers, the control group mis-categorized the hollow masks as convex 99% of the time, while those with schizophrenia had no trouble telling the difference, only getting it wrong 6% of the time.

This is because healthy people experience increased connectivity between two parts of the brain – the parietal cortex, which deals with top-down control and spatial attention, and the lateral occipital cortex, which deals with the bottom-up processing of visual data. The two work regions together to interpret visual data. In the case of something deliberately misleading like the hollow-face illusion, the healthy mind gets it wrong, but this connectivity is essential to a proper understanding of the world. People with schizophrenia, on the other hand, experience no such heightened connectivity, and so optical illusions like this don’t fool them…but this mental dysconnectivity greatly impairs their ability to comprehend the rest of the world.

The Window Illusion

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

This particular video is maybe the best demonstration of what’s known as the Ames trapezoid, and it has the added bonus of a posh British narrator, which makes almost anything better. It’s the creation of Adelbert Ames, Jr., an artist, psychologist, ophthalmologist, and…well, he was a lot of things, honestly. Ames was a master of forced perspective, creating lots of different illusions that arrange objects in just such a way that the mind can’t process how big they are or in which direction they’re moving.

The Ames window plays upon the latter. Our brains assume the window is rectangular, but it’s actually a trapezoid. The top and bottom of the window appear to be parallel, but they’re actually sloping towards each other. This means one side of the window is taller than the other. When the window is placed on a rotating stand, this fact starts to interfere with how we process perspective cues.

Let’s say you put a normal, rectangular window on the same stand. As it rotates, the side of the window that was further way would seem to get smaller, and the side that was closer would appear to get bigger. In other words, the rectangular window would look to us like it’s a trapezoid. When the Ames window is on there, things the muddled. As long as the actually shorter side is further away and the actually longer side is closer, there’s no problem.

But when the longer side is further away and the shorter side is closer, the window appears to stop rotating and then reverse direction, because our sense of perspective trumps our sense of continuous motion. This gets even freakier when a pipe is placed inside the window. Because the pipe isn’t playing any perspective tricks, it continues to rotate normally, which creates the apparently impossible effect where it passes straight through the window.

Adelbert Ames did a lot of other awesome work with perspective. His Ames rooms, in which perspective is distorted so that a person standing in one corner of the room appears to be tiny while a person in the other corner appears to be giant, remain common in the entertainment industry, and they were crucial to a lot of the trick photography seen in The Lord of the Rings movies.

Ames also helped explain scientifically the seemingly mystical phenomenon known as gravity hills. These are natural places where the surroundings are positioned just right to create the illusion that a slight downhill slope is actually an uphill slope. This can make rivers appear to flow uphill, or a car left in neutral seemingly roll upwards. This might be the most powerful illusion Ames discovered – after all, it’s an optical illusion that forces our brains to override our understanding of the law of gravity itself.

The Color Changing Card Trick

This one was brought to my attention in an earlier post I did about optical illusions by the rather awesomely named Citizen_Snips, who offers this setup:

I can’t help but think of this card trick. They tell you about the color change, but you never notice anything about the face values of the cards.

With that in mind, take a look: The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

Yes, that’s right – everything you just saw (including Citizen_Snips’s wonderfully sadistic intro) was one massive misdirection. This is an even more mindbending version of the Monkey Business Illusion, which is what the earlier post was about. Here, we’re so focused on trying to spot one unexpected event – in this case, how the card trick works – that we totally miss the presenters changing shirts and the set changing color.

This illusion is perhaps more purely mental than the others, as it plays less on how we see the world and more on how we organize and assess what we see. It’s a brilliant example of priming, which is where exposure to one stimulus – in this case, the presenters telling us they’re going to do a card trick – affects how we respond to later stimuli. Because they have focused our attention on one particular aspect of what we’re looking at, we tune out everything else in our field vision. If they had told us they were going to change their shirts, it’s likely we’d have a hard time describing how the card trick worked.

Priming can be a useful tool for turning the often chaotic mess of stimuli the world presents us with into something comprehensible. It also can lead us to miss the obvious, as we just saw, and it can cause a lot of faulty judgments. Indeed, priming is one of the key cognitive underpinnings of why we create stereotypes. For more on why priming is a necessary, if rather dangerous mental tool, check out this post over at Less Wrong.

The Castle Illusion

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

This is probably my favorite optical illusion on the internet. It’s the turbo-charged version of a better-known illusion that usually involves Jesus. All these illusions work because of the phenomenon of afterimages. In the simpler version of these illusions, you’re asked to look at an image for a prolonged period of time, then quickly shift your focus to a blank space, such as a white wall. This kickstarts a complex shift in the eye’s photoreceptors, which causes you to see the negative, or inverted, version of the original image.

Here’s what happens in your eyes. You have two types of photoreceptors – the rods, which function best in less intense light, and the cones, which do best in bright light. Fixing your eyes on a single point of focus and not blinking causes the cones to get overstimulated. Normally, the eyes could fix this by moving themselves around in tiny amounts that we wouldn’t consciously notice, but if the image you’re looking at is too big this becomes impossible.

If you overstimulate your cones for long enough, they just stop responding at all. When you switch your eyes to a blank space, the tired cones continue to send out a very weak signal, while the cones all around them that haven’t been activated send out normal, strong signals. As far as your brain is concerned, this is precisely the same thing as looking at the opposite color, and so that’s how it interprets what you’re seeing. Thus you suddenly see the inversion of the original image, turning some vaguely recognizable black lines into a clear image of Jesus.

The castle illusion takes this one awesome step further. While superimposing an inverted image of Jesus onto a blank space forces your brain to create a clear but shadowy image of him, we see something rather more complex here. The original image is an inversion of a color photo of the castle, and your brain is then forced to superimpose that image onto a grayscale version of the normal castle photo.

Because you still have all the spatial information about the image right in front of you, all your brain has to do is interpret the color – and that’s why a grayscale photo looks like it’s in perfect color, as long as you keep focusing on that central dot. It’s a truly mind-blowing illusion, and even better it’s easy to create your own. Here’s a tutorial from the castle illusion’s creator, John Sadowski.

And now for a parting gift…

I’ve shared with you five of my favorite optical illusions, but there’s tons more out there. Here’s a handy compilation of lots of different illusions, all set to a hypnotic beat. As the video itself proclaims, it’s a great way to give your mind a little break from whatever else you’re doing:

The web's best optical illusion videos...and how they trick your brain

For even more on the mindbending world of optical illusions, check out our previous post on the best visual illusion of 2010, as well as this guide to the new generation of illusions over at Gizmodo.

Additional reporting by Katharine Trendacosta.

Send an email to Alasdair Wilkins, the author of this post, at alasdair@io9.com.



Excerpt from:
The web’s best optical illusion videos…and how they trick your brain Video

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Back to top
Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes